Jauhar Saka islamic terrorism Hindu Rajput fightback

Jauhar also Jowhar or Juhar (जौहर) is an act of bravery shown by thousands of Hindu sisters and daughters to protect their modesty. It was done in response to series of rape attacks by gangster cult islam and it’s muslim scavengers. These muslim pests invaded Hindu territories at night and raided several houses committing acts of terrorism and genocide. Their hatred towards Hindus (kafirs) emanates from terrorism manual, quran.

There is an emerging trend seen among apologists and leftist-islamofasicts cabal to denigrate acts of Jauhar. They purposely do it to hide ugly face of islam that is responsible for Jauhar acts in the history of Bharat. This article is an earnest attempt to debunk concocted theories of those pathetic dhimmis.

Jauhar: Pride of Brave Hindu Women

According to wiki archives and britannica, Jauhar, historically, Indian rite of collective self-immolation, performed by the women, young children, and other dependants of a besieged fort or town when it was felt that holding out against the enemy was no longer possible and that honourable death appeared the only way out of the impasse.

Disgusting Animalistic Islam

Mohammed’s Necrophilia Crimes

Calling these human shaped creatures animalistic is also an insult to animals because even animals do not rape corpses like muslims follow legacy of enacting this necrophilia act and gang raping dead bodies.

Permission to loot, rape and terrorism towards Hindus and non-Muslims is glorified in quran. You can find jihadi activities of your neighbourhood muslims listed here. According to a hadith that exists in most authenticated islamic reference sources; Kanz al-‘Umal and al-Hujja fi Biyan al-Mahujja, Muhammad once took off his shirt, placed it on a dead woman, and then descended into and “LAY WITH HER” in the grave. He committed the act of necrophilia by having sex with his dead aunt.

In another citation, mohammed raping his dead aunt is clearly highlighted.

“I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I slept with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib”

The prophet was gladly referring to Fatima, his dead aunt, the mother of Ali. [Sahih Hadith from Bukhari (Book: 23, Hadith:374)].

Two counter pointers to those terrorist sympathisers of lunatic Muhammad who try to give false arguments;

First: The two Arabic words (ataja’ ma’ha اضطجع معها) which translate above as “LAY WITH HER” are indeed used in Arabic to mean “sexual intercourse.” This is similar to the English idiom “TO LAY WITH HER,” which means laying down with a woman, and is a direct reference to sex. Many Muslim scholars accept this linguistic semanticity.

In other cases, Muslim clerics openly admit Mohammed’s necrophilism act as a method to carve path of heaven for his dead aunt. They admit that Mohammed got undressed to make his dead aunt feel his divine body. Sexual act creates connection between two bodies. Mohammed was helping his dead aunt to remove her sins.

Second: The most barbaric and disgusting among all islamic cults is sunni. Sunni’s four orthodox schools of jurisprudence (or madhahib al-fiqh) namely, al-Hanafi, al-Hanbali, al-Maliki, and al-Shafi’i go one step further to implicitly permit necrophilia (sex with dead creatures). In the section on adultery, the Maliki teaching is this:

If a husband does sex with his dead wife – any which way, from front or behind – there is no penalty for him (Sharh Mukhtasar al-Khalil fi al-fiqh al-Maliki).

If still muslims try to divert and deceive you in denying this facts from their hadiths to save their face from embarrassment then stop them from justifying necrophilism acts of mohammed by showing latest development that is happening across islamic countries, acts of mohammed are proudly replicated by islamic govt, Egypt drafted law allowing man to have sex with dead wife.

islamic necrophilia jauhar sati

Necrophilia in the initial days of formation of islam is not an isolated incident, it is repeated multiple times in hadith as a noble act. Narrated Anas bin Malik:

We were (in the funeral procession) of one of the daughters of the Prophet and he was sitting by the side of the grave. I saw his eyes shedding tears.

He said, “Is there anyone among you who did not have sexual relations with his wife last night?”

Abu Talha replied in the affirmative. And so the Prophet told him to get down in the grave. And so he got down in her grave.

Apostle of Allah watched the act till it ended. [Sahih Hadith from Bukhari (Book: 23, Hadith: 426)].

Mohammed is considered as the most perfect man by muslims. He is given supreme authority in their gangster cult islam. Replication of his inhumane crimes is known as sunnat. Mohammedans replicate all disgusting acts of mohammed to please satan allah.

Mughal terrorists who invaded Bharat replicated all acts of terrorism, following mohammed. They serial raped many Hindu girls and daughters whenever they raided unarmed common people. They raped even dead bodies of beautiful girls to enact sunnat of mohammed’s necrophilia. Left with no choice when suddenly attacked by terrorist muslims, Hindu women saved dignity of their dead bodies by doing Jauhar. Ashes of brave Hindu women were of no use for muslim creatures.

Hindu women embraced sadgati by loudly chanting “Jai Bhavani” and “Har Har Mahadev” and jumping in a huge well of fire.

It is this disgusting acts of muslims and their craze for necrophilia that gave rise to Jauhar as a common practice to save modesty of a Hindu woman, a child, and babies.

You will like:   Mahabharat: Chapter 44 Kichaka Killed By Bhima

Origin of sati jauhar and ghunghat pratha

Mohammed’s Pedophilia Sins

Apart from girls even babies were not safe from muslims due to pedophile acts of mohammed. Mohammed married a six years old baby, Aisha and penetrated her when she was nine years old kid.

Sahih al-Bukhari Book 67, Hadith 70 stated:

حَدَّثَنَا مُعَلَّى بْنُ أَسَدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا وُهَيْبٌ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم تَزَوَّجَهَا وَهْىَ بِنْتُ سِتِّ سِنِينَ، وَبَنَى بِهَا وَهْىَ بِنْتُ تِسْعِ سِنِينَ‏.‏ قَالَ هِشَامٌ وَأُنْبِئْتُ أَنَّهَا كَانَتْ عِنْدَهُ تِسْعَ سِنِينَ‏.‏

Translated: Narrated Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that `Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).

A six years old kid has no knowledge about husband-wife relationship so many scholars and intellectual deem this as pedophilic act of mohammed, that of him raping a small kid of 9 years old.

Imagine the filth in the mind of a disgusting person who always had evil eyes on a 6 years old kid, Aisha when he visited home of his friend Abu Bakr Abdullah. The putrid thoughts in Mohammed’s mind made him ask Abu Bakr to marry his baby aisha. Muslims follow Mohammed acts as noble actions in the path of (Satan) Allah.

That is why, it is strongly recommended to Hindus – NEVER ALLOW ANY MUSLIM MEN OR WOMEN IN YOUR HOUSE – because their evil eyes prey on your babies, girls, sisters and daughters.

Jauhar, The Act of Hindu Bravery

To avoid torture, forceful sodomy, enslavement and gang rape at the hands of terrorist muslims, many Hindu children and women performed Jauhar.

Ignorants denigrate this brave act as a mass-suicide, not knowing the fact that they did this mass self-immolation to avoid conversion to islam and hellish sex slave life, which is core to the satanic principles of quran for non-muslim women.

If you light matchstick and suddenly it burns tip of your finger, how deep you feel the pain of burn, imagine the pain million times across your whole body that too for 7 minutes. This sacrifice of Jauhar by Hindu women is unmatchable in the world history.

This type of mass self-immolation was never practiced when Hindus fought among themselves. There were many armed conflicts that occurred between Hindu Rajputs and Hindu Marathas. Each war that ended with defeat was always treated with dignity by either side. No losing enemy’s women faced wrath and denigration as it happened in case of night raids of muslim invaders.

Hindu Women Bravery: Jauhar of Chittorgarh

The historical incident date back to 1303, Mewar was ruled by Rawal Ratan Singh.

Islamic terrorist Alauddin Khilji knew from his spies about opulence of Mewar kingdom. The information about zinc and silver mines of Zawar, Dariba and Agucha were already known to kings across Bharat. The treasure of magnificent temples worth billions of dollars in today’s time were property of deities and never abused by Hindu kings. Jihadi Alauddin Khilji was eager to loot Hindu temples and own natural resources of Mewar. In his pursuit to destroy Hindu kingdom and completely islamize the place, terrorist Alauddin marched to Chittor with his large army of 5 lakh soldiers, in which almost 70% were coward dhimmis (traitor Hindus) and rest 30% were converted muslims.

Terrorist Alauddin Khulji never thought the fort to be heavily protected and guarded. He sent his messengers to the Chittor fort gate for Hindu Rajputs to surrender. The angry Hindu Rawal Ratan Singh challenged him to fight and submission, though he knew that his army is proportionally very small. This lead Alauddin to surround the fort from all the sides and conduct a siege. He set up a camp between the Berach and Gambhiri rivers.

The siege went on for nearly 8 months, which suggests that the defenders put up a strong resistance. Amir Khusrau, who accompanied terrorist Alauddin to Chittor, has described the siege in brief, in his Khaza’in ul-Futuh. However, no detailed account of the siege operations is available which clearly indicate that no bravery acts were performed by Khilji or his commanders in this battle. Khusrau implies that the frontal attacks by the invaders failed twice. Alauddin also ordered the fort to be pelted with stones from siege engines (munjaniqs), while his armored soldiers attacked from all sides. The invaders expected the fort occupants to suffer from a famine or an epidemic.

Due to closure of food supplies to the fort, the long drawn siege gradually depleted all the resources. Hindu king Rawal Ratan Singh ordered to open the gate and fought ferociously against surrounding enemy. Defeat was inevitable due to large count of enemy soldiers, more than 25 times the Hindu Rajput army.

The Hindu women of Chittor had only one dignified option to commit Jauhar and face honourable death.

A huge hawan kund was filled with hawan samagri, it caught fire on its own as if Maa Bhavani was eager to accept her daughters and kids in her arms. The self sacrifice was started by Rani Padmini, she jumped in the huge hawan kund loudly chanting “Jai Bhavani” and “Har Har Mahadev” following her all other women also jumped in the burning kund.

This Jauhar inspired Hindu men to perform Saka. Saka is a brave tradition of Hindu Rajputs where men dressed in Bhagwa (Saffron) robes fight unto death. They fight the battle to never return home alive. Each Hindu fighter’s aim is to kill hundreds of enemy troops on his own. Before facing enemy, they celebrate their death glory by eating paan and feastful food.

So the Hindu men under king Rawal Ratan Singh donned saffron robes, smeared the holy ashes of their women on their foreheads, flung open the gates of the fort and thundered down the hill into the enemy ranks, to fight to the death. True to their legacy, they killed over 1.5 lakh troops of muslim invader Alaudin Khilji.

You will like:   Mahabharat: Chapter 18 Happiness in Indraprastha But Duryodhana Was Jealous

Terrorist Alauddin’s army entered Chittor, after the Hindu women commit Jauhar and the Hindu men fought in Saka. Alauddin captured an empty fortress. The victorious Alauddin considered his victory as Pyrrhic.

We all are Hindus today due to brave sisters of Chittor who embraced death over conversion to filthy cult islam.

The sacrifice of these women is not forgotten even today. To commemorate this sacrifice, Jauhar Mela is celebrated in Chittor every year.

jauhar hindu women bravery death

Hindu Women Bravery: Jauhar of Rani Karnavati

Rani Karnavati was from Bundi. She was married to Rana Sangram Singh in a royal Hindu ceremony in one of the grandest functions of that time. Rana Sangram is popularly known as Rana Sanga, he belonged to Hindu Sisodia dynasty of Chittorgarh.

Rana Sanga and Rani Karnavati performed Yagya and daily rituals, they were blessed with four sons including Vikramjit and Udai Singh.

Hindu king Rana Sangram was concerned about citizens and culture of his kingdom. To keep his territory resourceful and rich, he needed the place to be strong, protected and fortified. He began to secure his boundaries from terrorist muslims.

Rana Saga was also known for fierce counter attack to expand his territory to keep enemies far away from his territorial perimeter. There were continuous series of wars with the Afghan Lodhi dynasty of Delhi.

In the year 1518, Rana Sanga again showing his war skills headed the Hindu army and destroyed the islamic Lodhi army. This war killed thousands of enemies and injured many prominent soldiers of Chittorgarh. Unlike terrorist mughals, who always sent commanders to fight wars, Hindu kings had legacy of leading war from the front. Their leadership skills were demonstrated with their own actions. Rana Sanga was following this brave legacy and leading his army. Rana Sanga was surrounded by dozens of cavalry. He fiercely retaliated but got seriously wounded in the battle. His right arm was attacked by many soldiers, they tactically targeted his arm, after three massive blows, he lost his arm forever. Several arrows were struck on his legs and body. His shin bone was ruptured with several piercings of arrows. This made Rana Sanga handicap for life. The lameness of this great Hindu king was testimony of the traitor Dhimmi Hindus, who ignorant of their own Dharma, sided with the Jihadi Ibrahim Lodhi whose only aim was to establish Darul Islam in Mewar. Darul islam means death to all Hindu youths and sex slavery to all Hindu women and kids.

Hindu Rajput Saka fight to die for Sanatan Dharma

The weaponry skills of archery and dual sword fight was taught by dhimmi Hindu soldiers to their muslim counterparts. Muslims by nature are fearful and submissive. They could never wage fierce war however in almost all battles fought against great Hindu kings, the opposite army comprised of greedy and dhimmi Hindus who took side of mughal terrorists. Last 1000 years history of Bharat is filled with anecdotes that reveal – Dhimmi Hindus comprised from 70% to 90% in all major wars against Hindu kings. The front line of warriors were dhimmi Hindus followed by handful of muslim raiders.

Rana Sanga was already blind when his eye was pierced with arrow in the last battle. Though he won Battle of Khatoli he lost his natural and physical assets permanently. Even after being handicap he always fought battles and lead his army ferociously.

Later in the year 1527, before a fierce battle in Khanua, Hindu king Rana Sanga was seriously ill, still he was adamant to fight against mughal terrorist Babar (Babur) who had successfully invaded Delhi before this war. Rana Sanga was again surrounded by dhimmi Hindu archers. He was attacked, fighting against multiple assaults, he died as a DharmVeer to protect his Hindu kingdom, succumbing to his wounds. Rani Karnavati became widow of a great king. Mewar was now under leadership of her elder son Vikramjit.

The big fall of brave Hindu king Rana Sanga was celebrated by most muslim invaders. They took this as another step towards their dream of Darul Islam. Qutub-ud-din Bahadur Shah, invader of Gujarat, was eyeing Mewar for many years but fear of Rana Sanga kept him in control. Muslim terrorist Bahadur Shah with his large army attacked the Mewar kingdom. Hindu queen Rani Karnavati appealed to other Hindu Rajput rulers to get united and fight against invaders for the dharma and honor of Chittorgarh. Sages of Mewar advised Queen Karnawati to protect her sons so both the princes Vikramjit and Udai Singh were taken to Bundi for their safety with their mother figure Pana Dai who helped Karnawati during birth of her sons.

Rani Karnavati and other non-combatants Hindu citizens knew that with such an unequal war, the Rajput army would not win they will have to perform Saka for the Dharma. She lead the path to self-immolate in a hawan kund to perform Jauhar. Hundreds of Hindu women of Chittorgarh followed the brave Hindu Queen, chanting Jai Bhawani they jumped in the Dharmic kund of Jauhar. When defeat is inevitable, Jauhar is a way to protect dignity, modesty and satitva of women.

The mughal army count was proportionately 5 times the size of Hindu Rajput rulers. The only battle move left with Hindu Rajputs was Saka. The Rajputs mentally and physically prepared themselves to fight unto death like a warrior Takshak. They wore Bhagwa (Kesariya) dresses, had feastful of foods, exchanged paan and applied ashes of Hindu women on their forehead. They celebrated their death in advance to pursue path of Dharma and Hindu honour.

You will like:   How Hindus Should Take Revenge from Love Jihadi Muslim Terrorists

Jauhar Jowhar or Juhar was to avoid islamic necrophilia muslim sex slavery

Hindu Women Bravery: 1568 Jauhar of Chittorgarh

Hindu kings and their loyal Hindu fighters protected their territory for Hindu existence and Dharma. They fought for humanity against scavenging muslims who cease to be humans and became pests after accepting islam. The dhimmi Hindus as usual backstabbed Sanatan Dharma. The third destruction of Chittorgarh was made possible by dhimmi Hindus under invader Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar. Terrorist Akbar was equally barbaric, jihadist and inhumane like his predecessors. In the spring of 1568 CE, he marched towards Mewar for spreading his gangster cult islam. Rana Uday Singh was ruler of Mewar dynasty.

On the advice of his ministers and sages, Rana Uday Singh left the fort to camp in the vast open plains of Udaipur from where visibility of enemies was easy. Two brave Hindu chieftains Jaimal and Patta were posted to defend the fort along with 8000 Rajput warriors. Terrorist Akbar had proportionally huge army so they surrounded the fort from all sides.

Glorification of Khush Sex Slavery by Muslim Invaders

During this situation, Terrorist Akbar vowed to visit Sufi terrorist *Khwaja at Ajmer to give respect to گانڈو Gandu‘s rotten body, if he wins terrorist attack on Hindus. Jaimal and Fatta Sisodiya estimated the inevitable defeat so next day he requested women to take their decision, women suggested to perform mass Jauhar and on the night of February 22, approximately 8000 women self-immolate to prevent themselves from islamic slavery.

*Khwaja is an urdu term used for popular words – Khush/Hijda/Napunsak/Gandu/Eunuch. Harem was build to house captured non-muslim women and several muslim eunuchs after terrorism attacks – these Khwajas were abused for sexual advances by terrorist mughals. They were very close to chiefs of mughal invaders and used as sex concubines so they were ridiculed by common public. To make masses respect them, these eunuchs/gandus were given designation of Sufi saints by mughal terrorists.

All such eunuchs who were serving mughals were populated as Sufi saints further by leftist historians of Bharat however their background of sex slavery was slyly given less space.

These eunuchs/khwajas were kept happy by mughal terrorists due to their dual services – one, to sodomisely abuse them, second, as a team of protectors for women in harem. Being eunuch (Khwaja) they were not naturally inclined to abuse kafir women in harem.

Brave Fightback by Hindus

Saka is a war ritual that Hindu Rajput men follow after the women had committed jauhar to protect her modesty

Hindu Rajputs decided to fight bravely to death and perform Saka. Next day, the gates were opened and all the Hindu Rajput soldiers dressed up in saffron robes exchanged betel leaves and charged out ferociously to fight the enemies. Terrorist Akbar was shocked to see massive retaliation by Hindu Rajputs. He thought his message of surrender and submission of women to his fold would be accepted. He was very angry that the siege took some time and ordered the slaughter of more than 40,000 innocent unarmed old men, women, and children of Chittorgarh. Hindu Rajputs died killing more than 50% of the Mughal army but massacre of innocent children, men and women showed that Terrorist Akbar was almost successful in his Jihad march to islamize the place.

The sacrifice of Hindu Rajpuatnis saving their modesty inspired many Hindu kings across Bharat. Their body ashes got immortal forever in the form of songs and traditional folk stories. The courageous, fearless and gutsy act of Hindu women to jump in burning fire and accept honourable death became unmatched legacy for next generations.

Today’s Hindu men and women owe a lot to the sacrifices of Hindu Rajputs who fought mleccha muslim invaders since 7th century and kept alive Sanatan Hindu Dharma for us. They were first to bravely face terrorist muslims who invaded from western part of Bharat. It is time for Hindus to unite together and fight, equipped with modern day PathaGiri to make Hindu Rashtra for the world peace.

Jauhar Hindu Rajputani women sacrifice fight against islamic terrorism

Send me such articles

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Similar Posts

    6 Comments

    1. Hara Hara Mahadeva says:

      Muslims are not even compared to Animals. Paedophile Mohammad is a nasty demon doing Paedophilic, Necrophiliac activities. Muslims are curse to humanity.

      33
      3
      1. Sahyog Goswani UPwale says:

        Necrophilia in islam. Necrophilia done by mohammad and supported by his cult followers and muslim clerics. That is why globally, most of the necrophilia crimes are done by muslims.

        While necrophilia is a depravity not unique to any one modern culture, only Islam contains scriptures, commentaries, and fatwas (Islamic decrees) permitting the anti-human disgusting practice.

        In 2011 a leading Moroccan cleric and founding member of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, Sheikh Abdul Bari Zamzami, issued a fatwa permitting the Muslim husband to copulate with his dead wife. He prefaced his decree by saying that, although he does not necessarily approve of this act, it is not for him to ban what Islam permits (Muslim clerics are hypocrites they know it is wrong but since mohammad did it they want to repeat it). As proof, he cited several rulings of Islam’s schools of jurisprudence.

        In April 2012, when the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muhammad Morsi was president of Egypt, news that Islamist Egyptian parliamentarians were trying to pass a law legalizing necrophilia appeared. Al Ahram, Egypt’s most reputable paper, proudly reported the story.

        27
      2. Sahyog Goswani UPwale says:

        Read understanding mohammad. This is one of the best books in exposing islam. No doubt globally non-muslims and even ex-muslims spit on islamists and terrorist sympathisers. This is from his book.

        Thus, to fight in the cause of Allah became an ordinance, binding upon all
        Muslims. He roused the Meccan emigrants against their own kin and called for
        vengeance to be taken against those who alleged persecuted them. “Fight until there
        is no fitnah (mischief/dissension) and religion is wholly to Allah.” (Q. 8:39)
        When some of his followers showed reluctance to wage war on their own
        relatives, he warned them of their dire fate if they disobeyed. “And those who believe
        say: Why has not a chapter been revealed? But when a decisive chapter is revealed and fighting
        is mentioned therein you see those in whose hearts is a disease look to you with the look of one
        fainting because of death. Woe to them then!” (Q.47:20)

        If these verses tell us one thing, it is that Islam is by definition belligerent. As
        long as people believe in Islam and think that the Quran is the word of God, Islamic
        terrorism will always win out. Those within Islam who might call for moderation,
        tolerance and “dialogue between civilizations,” are easily silenced by the authority
        of the Quran, so many of its verses rouse believers to wage war against unbelievers.
        “Fight then in Allah’s way; this is not imposed on you except in relation to yourself,
        and rouse the believers to ardor maybe Allah will restrain the fighting of those who
        disbelieve and Allah is strongest in prowess and strongest to give an exemplary
        punishment.” (Q. 4:84)

        Promising his followers success, he said: “And Allah will by no means give the
        unbelievers a way against the believers,” (Q. 4:141) and reassuring them of
        heavenly rewards he said, “Those who believed and fled (their homes), and strove
        hard in Allah’s way with their property and their souls, are much higher in rank
        with Allah; and those are they who are the achievers (of their objects). (Q. 9:20)

        15
    2. Govind Patwardhan says:

      Brilliant research done.

      21
      1
      1. Sahyog Goswani UPwale says:

        Ali Sina further exposed terrorist mohammad in his book. He quotes verses of Hadiths, Qurans and islamic scholars advocacies.

        Ali Sina (an iranian ex muslim who was once proud of his islamic scholarship) wrote in his book “There are countless cases in which Muhammad broke the laws of the land and disregarded the codes of ethics and morality. Laying siege to merchant caravans or raiding villages and seizing their wealth is theft and is against the law in any society. From incest to polygamy, from rape to paedophilia, from assassination to genocide, the Prophet of Allah did them all. He was disdainful of authorities, and so are Muslims. He was deceitful and violent and so are his followers. ”

        The raids did not just bring wealth to Muslims; it also provided them with sex slaves. Juwairiya was a young woman whose husband was slain when Muslims raided her village. She fell to the lot of a Muslim marauder. Aisha, Muhammad’s favorite and youngest wife who had accompanied Muhammad in this expedition and narrated:

        When the mohammad distributed the captives of Banu Al Mustaliq, she (Juwairiya) fell to the lot of Thabit ibn Qyas. She was married to her cousin, who was killed during the battle. She gave Thabit a deed, agreeing to pay him nine okes of gold for her freedom. She was a very beautiful woman. She captivated every man who saw her. She came to the prophet – peace be upon him -, to ask for his help in the matter. As soon as I saw her at the door of my room, I took a dislike to her, for I knew that he would see her as I saw her. She went in and told him who she was, the daughter of al-Harith ibn Dhirar, the chief of his people. She said: ‘You can see the state to which I have been brought. I have fallen to the lot of Thabit, and have given him a deed for ransom, and I have to come to ask your help in the matter.’ He said: ‘would you like something better than that? I will discharge your debt, and marry you.’ She said: ‘Yes.’ ‘O then it is Done!’ the messenger of Allah replied.

        This account should end any argument about the real motive behind Muhammad’s multiple marriages. He and his men murdered Juwairiya’s husband in an unprovoked raid. She was the daughter of the chief of Bani Mustaliq and a princess in her own right. She was reduced to a slave and became the possession of one of Muhammad’s thugs. However, because of her beauty, the holy Prophet offered to “set her free” under the condition that she marry him. Is that freedom?

        What other choice did she have? Even if Muhammad did actually set her free, where could she go?

        Muslim apologists insist that most of Muhammad’s wives were widows. One could thus get the impression that they were old and unwanted and that he married them out of charity. What they leave out is that these “widows” were young and beautiful, and they had become widows because Muhammad had murdered their husband. Juwairiya was 20 years old at the time and Muhammad was 58.

        Muhammad’s own biographers admit that he did not marry women unless they were young, beautiful, and childless. Except for Sauda, all Muhammad’s wives were in their teens or early twenties and this is when he was in his fifties and sixties. The historian Tabari narrates that Muhammad solicited Hind bint Abu Talib, his own cousin, to marry him, but when she told him that she had a child he desisted. Another woman was Zia’h bint Aamir. Muhammad asked someone to solicit her for marriage.

        She accepted, but when he was told of her age, he changed his mind.

        A Muslim named Jarir ibn Abdullah narrated that Muhammad asked him,
        “Have you got married?” He replied in the affirmative. Muhammad enquired, “A virgin or a matron?” He responded, “I married a matron.” Then Muhammad said, “Why not a virgin? So you may play with her and she may play with you?”

        One of the most disgusting and anti-human acts of terrorist mohammad is mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari 5134.

        Narrated Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated (had sex with her) his marriage when she was just nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that `Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).
        [ Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 5134 In-book reference: Book 67, Hadith 70 ]

        18
        1. Hara Hara Mahadeva says:

          Yes, even Nizams and Razakars of Hyderabad commited more Nechrophile crimes. In Hyderabad old city at present, these Nechrophiles are multiplying like termites. Terrorists owaISIS are also Nechrophiles.

          10

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *